Suggestions for Change

The first example of international regulation that could positively impact security and safety is consistent education and certification for all involved in ocean going vessels. A template for this education and certification process is the curriculum of “The Nautical Institute.” This organization aims to promote and co-ordinate nautical studies world-wide by promoting high standards of qualification, competence and knowledge among those on or concerned with the sea. The Nautical Institute facilitates the exchange and publication of information and ideas on nautical science and seeks to establish and maintain professional standards. The Nautical Institute also co-operates with government departments and others concerned with qualifications, and with educational institutes and authorities to promote the training and practice of nautical science. (The Nautical Institute) Imagine the benefits of genuine qualification requirements for all seafarers and vessels.

I’m not recommending a global Coast Guard, just a consistent set of regulations and requirements that can be equally enforced to improve all levels of security and safety. The example of the US Coast Guard can be used because of its clear charter including a blend of humanitarian, security and law enforcement, diplomatic and military capabilities. (Department of Homeland Security) Regardless of the template used, the most important accomplishment is to reach global consistency in maritime law and enforcement.

I am stating that there is an immediate need for follow through on many failed historical efforts. The example of a significant effort is the rejection of the international treaty drafted in 1982. This treaty was rejected by the United States and other countries. There were valid objections but they were not resolved to the member’s satisfaction. Kudos to the United Nations for holding 3 conferences on “Law of the Sea” but still no international agreement exists.